ScreenJournal

Review

Review is a triage list. Instead of scrolling a full day on Activity, it lists only the segments of one member that fall into the cases you choose, across a day, a week or a month of history, so a manager can work through them in one sitting.

Review

Who can open it

Anyone who can see other members: owners, admins, managers, viewers, team managers with a team, and anyone with reportees. An employee with nobody reporting to them doesn't see it in the sidebar.

Choosing what to list

What you see: a person selector (defaults to you), a Daily / Weekly / Monthly period selector with previous / next arrows, and a case filter.

Cases you can tick:

  • Fake Productivity — segments overlapping a fake-productivity signal from the recorder.
  • Jiggler — segments where the pointer trail looked like a mouse jiggler. Hidden when your organisation has switched jiggler detection off in the desktop policy.
  • Unproductive — score 1–2.
  • Neutral — score 3.
  • Manual — entries added by hand.
  • Corrected — segments an admin re-scored.

The selection is in the page address, so a review link can be shared. A load covers at most 30 days at a time; step the period for older history.

Reading the list

Each item is the same card as on the Activity timeline, with the same three actions gated the same way: Correct score, Play recording and Redact (see Activity Timeline). Under a card, red lines list any fake-productivity signals whose time range covers it: the signal, a description, and the overlapping ranges.

A card with no red lines is not "cleared": it only means no signal was attached to it, or the screening hasn't run for that day yet. The status line shows how many segments are listed and how far a long load has got.