ScreenJournal

What is a work timeline?

Updated on 6 July 2026

A work timeline is a detailed, AI-written record of the workday: which apps, what was done, how long it took and how productive it was. ScreenJournal builds one for every person automatically, and everything else (timesheets, reports, the chronicle) is generated from it, and standups are drafted from it on request.

What does a work timeline show?

Each entry on a work timeline shows the app the work happened in, a plain-English summary of what was done, how long it took and a productivity score. Entries are grouped into sessions across the day, so the timeline reads as the story of a workday rather than a list of application names.

The difference from a conventional daily work log is who writes it and from what. Nobody fills a work timeline in. ScreenJournal writes it from the work itself, so an entry reads "prepared the March invoice run and corrected two rate mismatches" with an app badge and the real duration against it, not "spreadsheet, 9:14 to 10:02". Expand an entry and the context behind the summary is there for anyone who needs the detail.

Proof: the Activity page shows a scored, per-session timeline; entries carry app badges, durations, plain-English summaries and scores, and expand for context.

The ScreenJournal Activity page showing a scored, per-session work timeline with app badges, durations and plain-English entry summaries

How does ScreenJournal build a work timeline?

ScreenJournal builds the timeline in three steps. It records screen activity as short-lived video while work happens. A frontier AI model analyses that video to understand the work and measure output. The video is then deleted immediately during processing, and the timeline is what remains.

This is derive-and-discard: the screen is read only long enough to derive understanding, then the footage is discarded. Capture is scoped to work apps and work-related activity; personal activity is skipped in real time. Keystrokes are not logged at any point, because ScreenJournal reads work output, not typing.

Writing the timeline from the work itself also makes it hard to cheat. Activity percentages built from mouse and keyboard input can be gamed with a jiggler; a timeline built from output cannot, because motion is not work and the timeline only records work.

What does the productivity score mean?

The score on each timeline entry measures the work in that entry, not how busy the apps looked. It is derived from what was actually done, so time spent in the right application does not raise it by itself. Every employee sees their own scores, and scores are contestable: a "Change my score" request sits directly on the entry. Nudges are off by default in Automations, so the timeline informs managers rather than pestering employees.

Proof: per-entry scores with a "Change my score" request in the timeline; nudges off by default in Automations.

A per-entry score in the ScreenJournal timeline with a pending Change my score request.

What stays private on a work timeline?

Personal activity stays private, along with anything an employee chooses to redact before a manager sees it. Personal activity is skipped in real time, and anything personal that slips through is captured as a "Personal" entry and hidden automatically. Every entry carries a Redact control, and redaction erases the entry entirely: it never appears in anyone's search afterwards. Redaction is unavailable only for roles a company flags as a data-leak risk. PII is removed during processing, and there is no second, secret view: employees see the same activity view managers do.

One kind of entry cannot be hidden: genuine policy violations, for example a data-handling breach, are held as locked policy captures that stay visible to compliance. Everything else follows the privacy-first flow, and there is no footage to fall back on, because the raw screen data is deleted immediately during processing.

Proof: the member timeline has a Redact control, an auto-hidden "Personal" entry type and a locked "Policy capture" state; employees share the manager's view.

A member's work timeline showing the Redact control, an auto-hidden Personal entry and a locked Policy capture entry

What does ScreenJournal generate from work timelines?

Timesheets, reports, answers and the chronicle: everything else in ScreenJournal is generated from the timeline. One click on "Prepare timesheet" turns the day into billable lines, each carrying a source badge showing which work it came from and a "to verify" count flagging anything worth a glance; move a line once and a "remember this" rule applies the same mapping next time. Reports come from the same record, through a template gallery, saved reports and a rendered Weekly Digest. Ask AI sits on every page and answers from the derived data, never from footage. And over time, timelines accumulate into the work chronicle, a searchable history of the team's work, queried through chat or MCP and permission-scoped by role.

Proof: one-click "Prepare timesheet" with per-line source badges and a "to verify" count; the report template gallery and rendered Weekly Digest; Ask AI on every page.

A one-click ScreenJournal timesheet with per-line source badges and a to-verify count, with the Ask AI panel open.

What did my team do today?

That question is the reason work timelines exist, and it has a direct answer: open the Activity page and read each person's day as scored, plain-English entries, or ask the built-in chat and get the summary in seconds. There is no footage to scrub and nothing to interpret, because the interpretation happened when the timeline was written.

Who are work timelines for?

Work timelines suit any industry where work happens on a computer. Managers of remote, hybrid, offshore and BPO teams get an accurate record of what was actually done, without watching screens or scrolling screenshot archives. Employees get their real output recognised: someone who ships excellent work in two focused hours is finally visible, and someone gaming a timer is not. If you are weighing this approach against screenshot trackers, surveillance suites or activity analytics, see ScreenJournal vs the alternatives for the honest comparison.

Frequently asked questions

Can employees see their own work timeline?

Yes. Employees see the same activity view managers do, including every entry, duration and score. Scores are contestable: an employee who disagrees with how a piece of work was scored can request a change directly from the timeline.

Can an employee hide personal activity from their timeline?

Yes. Personal activity is skipped in real time, and anything personal that slips through is captured as a "Personal" entry and hidden automatically. Employees can also redact entries before a manager sees them; a redacted entry is erased entirely and never appears in anyone's search. Only genuine policy violations, held as locked policy captures, cannot be hidden.

How is a work timeline different from a time tracker's activity log?

A time tracker logs hours and an activity percentage calculated from mouse and keyboard input, which says nothing about what was produced and is easy to fake with a jiggler. A work timeline records the work itself: what was done, in which app, for how long, with a productivity score.

What is ScreenJournal?

ScreenJournal is an AI work visibility tool that reads on-screen work as it happens, turns it into a detailed timeline of what each person actually did, and then deletes the raw screen data. Timelines accumulate into a searchable chronicle of everyone's work history, and from them ScreenJournal generates timesheets and reports automatically and drafts standup summaries on request, answering questions about any of it in plain English.

See the work itself, not screenshots of it

Timesheets, reports and answers from the work your team actually did. Available for Windows and macOS, with Linux and mobile support coming soon.